H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Patricia Medrado vs Andrea Tiezzi H2H: 2-0
Patricia Medrado holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Tiezzi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Medrado leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1982 Sao Paulo round-robin match 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1982 | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | RR | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 6-2 6-4 | Andrea Tiezzi | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1982* | Porto Alegre | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 7-5 6-1 | Andrea Tiezzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Andrea Tiezzi | — | — | — | 1,584 | 22 | 29 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Medrado | Andrea Tiezzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |