H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patricia Medrado vs Angelika Kanellopoulou H2H: 0-2
Angelika Kanellopoulou holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angelika Kanellopoulou leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelika Kanellopoulou won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 6-7(4) 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Angelika Kanellopoulou | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-0 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1985* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Angelika Kanellopoulou | 7-5 7-6 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Angelika Kanellopoulou | — | — | — | 1,718 | 71 | 88 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Patricia Medrado | Angelika Kanellopoulou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |