H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patricia Medrado vs Emilse Raponi Longo H2H: 2-0
Patricia Medrado holds a 2–0 lead over Emilse Raponi Longo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1988 Guaruja third round 4-6 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 1988* | Guaruja | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Patricia Medrado | 4-6 6-4 7-6 | Emilse Raponi Longo | Match data |
| May 9, 1986* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 6-2 6-3 | Emilse Raponi Longo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Emilse Raponi Longo | — | — | — | 1,592 | 32 | 62 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Medrado | Emilse Raponi Longo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |