H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Patricia Medrado vs Julie Harrington H2H: 0-1

Julie Harrington holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Harrington leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Harrington won the 1981 Tokyo Borden semifinal 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Julie Harrington
USA Age 64

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Harrington 4-6 6-3 6-2 Patricia Medrado Match data Oct 17, 1981* SF Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Medrado #359 #67 9 1,836 152 163 48.3% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Julie Harrington #175 #70 — 1,741 55 80 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Medrado Julie Harrington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,523 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0 1980 12–17 41.4% — 1,602 0 0
19 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,724 0 0
20 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,589 0 0
21 1978 6–11 35.3% — 1,582 0 1 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0
22 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,599 0 1 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0
23 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,647 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,738 0 8 — — — — — — —
25 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,778 0 10 — — — — — — —
26 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,576 0 10 — — — — — — —
27 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 1985 8–14 36.4% #108 1,542 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,561 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10 — — — — — — —
31 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Medrado Julie Harrington
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5%
21 1978 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 25 49 74 33.8% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5% — 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 11 22 33 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Medrado Julie Harrington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1524 114.6 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.68
18 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +1.01 1980 1602 125.8 — — — — -16 -20 -127 42.9% -0.17 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.7 -1.23
19 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.02 1981 1725 127.6 — — — — +24 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.5 +2.87
20 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68 1982 1589 116.4 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.86
21 1978 1582 115.6 — — — — +3 -32 — 36.6% -1.05 5–2 (71%) — — -0.14 1983 1629 115.5 — — — — +33 -32 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.39
22 1979 1600 122.4 — — — — -32 +22 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.16 1984 1571 105.9 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.33
23 1980 1647 127.0 — — — — — -68 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1739 134.1 — — — — -124 -50 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.5 +2.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1779 140.8 — — — — -197 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1577 104.0 — — — — -93 +205 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1588 120.4 — — — — -112 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1542 114.5 — — — — -92 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -82 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -107 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -66 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1837 128.4 — — — — -99 +60 — 49.5% +0.04 36–57 (39%) 36–29 (55%) 95.0 +2.62 — 1741 124.4 — — — — +18 -28 -127 42.0% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.