H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Patricia Medrado vs Kate Glancy H2H: 3-0

Patricia Medrado holds a 3–0 lead over Kate Glancy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patricia Medrado leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1982 São Paulo Open round robin 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Kate Glancy
CAN Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Medrado 6-0 6-4 Kate Glancy Match data Apr 13, 1982 RR São Paulo Open WTA 250 Clay
Patricia Medrado 7-6 6-4 Kate Glancy Match data Mar 27, 1982* SF Rio de Janeiro WTA 250 Clay
Patricia Medrado 6-0 6-4 Kate Glancy Match data Jun 29, 1981* QF Marseille WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Medrado — #67 9 1,837 156 164 48.8% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Kate Glancy — — — 1,582 20 35 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Medrado Kate Glancy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1977 1–3 25.0% — 1,459 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,461 0 0
19 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1 1980 1–5 16.7% — 1,422 0 0
21 1978 10–12 45.5% — 1,626 0 1 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,423 0 0
22 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,632 0 1 1982 14–15 48.3% — 1,455 0 0
23 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,656 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,740 0 8 — — — — — — —
25 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,779 0 10 — — — — — — —
26 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,577 0 10 — — — — — — —
27 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 1985 8–14 36.4% — 1,542 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,562 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10 — — — — — — —
31 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Medrado Kate Glancy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1978 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
23 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 29 50 79 36.7% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5% — 4 10 14 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Medrado Kate Glancy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1492 95.3 — — — — — +24 — 33.3% -2.00 — — — +0.26
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1476 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.39
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1460 103.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.19
18 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +0.95 1978 1461 102.3 — — — — +121 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 — — +0.18
19 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68 1980 1423 87.3 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.75 — — — +0.28
21 1978 1627 116.6 — — — — +12 -76 — 40.4% -0.75 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 109.3 +0.30 1981 1424 99.1 — — — — +110 — — 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — +0.43
22 1979 1633 122.5 — — — — -19 -10 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 101.8 -0.21 1982 1455 107.3 — — — — +25 +101 — 46.2% -0.15 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +3.23
23 1980 1657 127.1 — — — — — -77 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1740 134.1 — — — — -99 -51 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.3 +2.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1780 140.9 — — — — -182 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 98.9 -1.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1578 104.1 — — — — -85 +204 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1589 120.4 — — — — -106 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1543 114.5 — — — — -89 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -78 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -104 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -64 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1838 128.5 — — — — -84 +56 — 49.6% +0.05 39–57 (41%) 38–30 (56%) 96.2 +2.24 — 1583 100.8 — — — — +68 +89 — 37.2% -0.95 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +9.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.