H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patricia Medrado vs Neige Dias H2H: 1-1
Patricia Medrado and Neige Dias are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Neige Dias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Neige Dias won the 1987 Guaruja final 6-0 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1987* | Guaruja | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Neige Dias | 6-0 6-7 6-4 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1981* | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R32 | — | Patricia Medrado | 6-1 6-0 | Neige Dias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Neige Dias | — | — | — | 1,748 | 75 | 75 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Medrado | Neige Dias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |