H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Patricia Medrado vs Zenda Liess H2H: 0-1

Zenda Liess holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zenda Liess leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Zenda Liess won the 1976 Tallahassee round of 32 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Zenda Liess
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zenda Liess 6-1 6-0 Patricia Medrado Match data Mar 11, 1976* R32 Tallahassee WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Medrado #359 #67 9 1,836 152 163 48.3% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Zenda Liess — — — 1,743 42 61 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Medrado Zenda Liess
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1974 7–7 50.0% — 1,554 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,573 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 7–4 63.6% — 1,668 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1977 4–13 23.5% — 1,619 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0 1978 16–17 48.5% — 1,742 0 0
19 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0 1979 3–11 21.4% — 1,662 0 0
20 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1 1980 1–4 20.0% — 1,610 0 0
21 1978 6–11 35.3% — 1,582 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,647 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,738 0 8 — — — — — — —
25 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,778 0 10 — — — — — — —
26 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,576 0 10 — — — — — — —
27 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 1985 8–14 36.4% #108 1,542 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,561 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10 — — — — — — —
31 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Medrado Zenda Liess
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 6 6 0.0%
18 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1978 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 25 49 74 33.8% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5% — 9 19 28 32.1% 23 24 47 48.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 13 18 27.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Medrado Zenda Liess
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1554 119.5 — — — — — -29 — 50.0% +0.32 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.30
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1574 114.9 — — — — — +15 — 47.8% -0.09 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.13
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1669 124.1 — — — — — +28 — 59.1% +1.09 1–1 — — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1619 124.4 — — — — -92 +63 — 30.6% -1.64 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 -0.82
18 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +1.01 1978 1743 135.7 — — — — -78 -37 — 50.0% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.24
19 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.02 1979 1662 120.1 — — — — -29 -5 — 28.1% -1.97 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.45
20 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68 1980 1610 95.3 — — — — -77 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
21 1978 1582 115.6 — — — — +3 -32 — 36.6% -1.05 5–2 (71%) — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 1600 122.4 — — — — -32 +22 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 1647 127.0 — — — — — -68 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1739 134.1 — — — — -124 -50 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.5 +2.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1779 140.8 — — — — -197 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1577 104.0 — — — — -93 +205 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1588 120.4 — — — — -112 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1542 114.5 — — — — -92 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -82 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -107 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -66 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1837 128.4 — — — — -99 +60 — 49.5% +0.04 36–57 (39%) 36–29 (55%) 95.0 +2.62 — 1744 131.4 — — — — -71 +6 — 43.4% -0.57 11–17 (39%) 10–9 (53%) 98.1 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.