H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patti Hogan vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 2-0
Patti Hogan holds a 2–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patti Hogan leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Patti Hogan won the 1975 Wimbledon second round 6-2 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 77
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1973* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Patti Hogan | 7-5 8-6 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patti Hogan | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |