H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 0-1
Kathy Horvath holds a 1–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1986 US Open second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kathy Horvath | 7-5 6-4 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Patty Fendick | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |