H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 5-13

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 13–5 lead over Patty Schnyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 9–3 on hard courts and 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2008 New Haven fourth round 6-4 3-6 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
5 – 13
18 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 22, 2008* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #33 6-4 3-6 7-6(6) Patty Schnyder #16 Match data
Jan 5, 2008* Gold Coast WTA 500 QF Hard Patty Schnyder #16 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #18 Match data
Feb 18, 2006* Antwerp WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-2 6-4 Patty Schnyder #9 Match data
Jan 26, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 6-0 Patty Schnyder #8 Match data
May 15, 2005* Rome WTA 1000 F Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 2-6 6-3 6-4 Patty Schnyder #13 Match data
Feb 19, 2005* Antwerp WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 4-6 6-4 6-3 Patty Schnyder #14 Match data
Oct 8, 2004* Filderstadt WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #1 7-5 6-4 Patty Schnyder #15 Match data
Oct 17, 2003* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Patty Schnyder #18 6-2 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #7 Match data
Oct 10, 2003* Filderstadt WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #7 6-2 7-6(3) Patty Schnyder #18 Match data
Sep 1, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #9 6-1 6-4 Patty Schnyder #21 Match data
Apr 18, 2002* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Patty Schnyder #30 6-4 3-6 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #10 Match data
Oct 12, 2001* Filderstadt WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #6 3-6 6-3 7-5 Patty Schnyder #50 Match data
May 11, 2001* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #9 6-1 4-6 6-0 Patty Schnyder #35 Match data
Jan 20, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Patty Schnyder #29 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #6 Match data
Oct 29, 1999* Linz WTA 500 R16 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #12 6-2 6-2 Patty Schnyder #22 Match data
May 7, 1999* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #16 5-7 6-2 6-4 Patty Schnyder #12 Match data
Jan 22, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #29 6-7(1) 6-4 6-3 Patty Schnyder #9 Match data
Apr 1, 1998* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R64 Clay Patty Schnyder #18 6-3 7-6 Amélie Mauresmo #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11 — — — — — — —
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11 — — — — — — —
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11 — — — — — — —
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11 — — — — — — —