H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Patty Schnyder vs Florencia Labat H2H: 1-2

Florencia Labat holds a 2–1 lead over Patty Schnyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Florencia Labat leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1998 Canadian Open round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florencia Labat #60 6-4 6-3 Patty Schnyder #10 Match data Aug 19, 1998* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Patty Schnyder #29 6-3 6-2 Florencia Labat #40 Match data Aug 21, 1997* R32 Atlanta Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Florencia Labat #48 7-6 7-5 Patty Schnyder #64 Match data Jan 9, 1997* R32 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,984 495 350 58.6% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Schnyder Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 7–10 41.2% #64 1,586 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,709 0 0 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1998 51–20 71.8% #11 1,903 0 5 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,792 0 6 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,750 0 6 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0
22 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0
23 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0
24 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,809 0 8 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,780 0 0
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #14 1,808 0 8 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0
26 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,932 0 10 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,889 0 10 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,885 0 10 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2008 34–22 60.7% #14 1,820 0 11 2000 8–10 44.4% #106 1,609 0 0
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,754 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,798 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,668 0 11 — — — — — — —
37 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11 — — — — — — —
38 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,628 0 11 — — — — — — —
39 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patty Schnyder Florencia Labat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 9 9 18 50.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1998 17 9 26 65.4% 27 6 33 81.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1999 16 10 26 61.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — —
21 2000 15 11 26 57.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2001 11 10 21 52.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2003 14 9 23 60.9% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2005 42 17 59 71.2% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 2006 30 15 45 66.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2007 30 18 48 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2008 25 16 41 61.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2009 8 12 20 40.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 11 9 20 55.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 175 439 60.1% 188 120 308 61.0% 15 22 37 40.5% 28 33 61 45.9% — 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patty Schnyder Florencia Labat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1483 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18
16 1995 1527 112.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 1586 120.2 — — — — -33 +52 — 40.5% -0.76 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 105.4 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1710 151.6 — — — — -46 +9 — 50.0% +0.26 1–11 (8%) 4–5 (44%) 90.4 -0.80 1989 1546 110.9 — — — — +37 +1 — 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.52
19 1998 1903 159.4 — — — — -62 +111 -333 66.7% +1.21 15–12 (56%) 10–5 (67%) 109.2 -0.16 1990 1573 118.7 — — — — +20 -15 — 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08
20 1999 1792 148.7 — — — — +35 +80 — 54.3% -0.08 13–12 (52%) 8–1 (89%) 102.0 -0.13 1991 1671 134.2 — — — — -10 -1 — 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64
21 2000 1751 142.6 — — — — +23 +53 -191 53.4% +0.31 11–8 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 -1.04 1992 1730 132.2 — — — — +20 -68 — 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 — +0.14
22 2001 1734 129.7 — — — — -24 +33 -136 53.1% -0.08 7–14 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.1 +0.22 1993 1762 141.4 — — — — -20 +7 -160 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64
23 2002 1848 146.2 — — — — -30 -40 -263 53.7% +0.32 15–7 (68%) 10–5 (67%) 109.0 -1.16 1994 1788 139.9 — — — — -25 — -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06
24 2003 1810 143.5 +3.50 +0.33 1.160 53.0% +28 -43 — 51.4% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 +0.37 1995 1781 133.7 — — — — -26 +8 — 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.32
25 2004 1809 142.7 +3.52 +0.81 1.159 52.9% +2 +9 -226 59.7% +0.61 12–8 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 +1.41 1996 1772 142.8 — — — — +32 -66 -49 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20
26 2005 1932 158.1 +2.86 +1.20 1.093 51.8% -18 +31 — 66.2% +1.20 19–17 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 99.0 +3.23 1997 1675 134.1 — — — — +5 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02
27 2006 1890 156.1 +3.89 +1.47 1.148 53.0% +35 +25 — 62.8% +0.85 10–8 (56%) 12–7 (63%) 102.4 +1.42 1998 1656 126.6 — — — — +51 -6 +31 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.12
28 2007 1886 151.5 +4.70 +1.91 1.163 53.3% -17 +90 -218 61.6% +1.02 13–13 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 94.4 +2.16 1999 1620 118.4 — — — — +82 -10 — 35.0% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.60
29 2008 1821 141.5 +3.54 +0.46 1.097 51.8% -3 +98 — 57.7% +0.47 11–9 (55%) 10–3 (77%) 102.4 +2.47 2000 1609 110.7 — — — — +27 +28 — 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45
30 2009 1754 137.4 +1.61 -0.95 0.991 49.8% -10 +114 — 49.0% -0.07 7–5 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 103.6 -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 1799 133.5 -0.01 -0.10 0.972 49.4% -35 +64 — 51.0% +0.09 12–2 (86%) 3–8 (27%) 104.3 -1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2011 1668 112.8 -2.14 -2.61 0.773 44.9% +67 +63 — 27.6% -1.34 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 1632 99.5 -0.77 +0.04 1.027 50.7% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 1628 107.6 -0.85 -0.91 1.035 50.3% — — — 50.0% +0.34 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 1597 111.4 -1.17 -1.12 0.861 46.5% — +29 — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 151.9 +2.71 +0.57 1.069 51.4% -6 +46 -221 56.5% +0.46 164–137 (54%) 110–75 (59%) 105.5 +0.53 — 1868 138.5 — — — — +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.