H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Pauline Parmentier vs Chanelle Scheepers H2H: 1-0
Pauline Parmentier holds a 1–0 lead over Chanelle Scheepers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pauline Parmentier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2009 Memphis fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2009* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Pauline Parmentier | 6-4 6-1 | Chanelle Scheepers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pauline Parmentier | Chanelle Scheepers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |