H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Pauline Parmentier vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 1-1
Pauline Parmentier and Daniela Hantuchova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2011 US Open first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Pauline Parmentier | 6-2 6-3 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2008* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-2 7-5 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pauline Parmentier | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 |