H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pauline Parmentier vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 1-2
Dominika Cibulkova holds a 2–1 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Dominika Cibulkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2016 Katowice semifinal 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2016* | Katowice | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-5 6-0 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
| May 5, 2010* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-1 3-6 7-5 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2007* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Pauline Parmentier | 6-2 6-2 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pauline Parmentier | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |