H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Pauline Parmentier vs Naomi Broady H2H: 1-0

Pauline Parmentier holds a 1–0 lead over Naomi Broady in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pauline Parmentier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2016 Katowice second round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pauline Parmentier
France Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Naomi Broady
Great Britain Age 36 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pauline Parmentier #101 3-6 7-5 6-3 Naomi Broady #129 Match data Oct 16, 2017 Q3 Q Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Pauline Parmentier #113 6-4 7-5 Naomi Broady #78 Match data Apr 8, 2016* R16 Katowice International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,703 120 188 39.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Naomi Broady #1,209 #76 875 1,604 24 42 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pauline Parmentier Naomi Broady
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,506 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #298 1,484 0 0
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #287 1,469 0 0
21 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1 2011 1–2 33.3% #196 1,472 0 0
22 2008 17–21 44.7% #61 1,581 0 2 2012 0–1 0.0% #287 1,463 0 0
23 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,443 0 2 2014 1–3 25.0% #170 1,459 0 0
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,439 0 2 2015 5–5 50.0% #121 1,511 0 0
26 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2 2016 10–15 40.0% #91 1,495 0 0
27 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,464 0 2 2017 6–11 35.3% #117 1,551 0 0
28 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,522 0 2 2018 1–3 25.0% #250 1,485 0 0
29 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,459 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,579 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,683 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2019 11–22 33.3% #123 1,594 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,540 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pauline Parmentier Naomi Broady
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2007 7 2 9 77.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2008 6 12 18 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 2 4 6 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2011 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 5 8 13 38.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 7 11 18 38.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 99 165 40.0% 48 70 118 40.7% 5 17 22 22.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 20 22 42 47.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 18 22 18.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 281/306 of Pauline Parmentier's and 59/66 of Naomi Broady's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pauline Parmentier Naomi Broady
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2005 1/3 2.0 5.0 50.0% 45.8% 29.2% 25.0% 100.0% 37.5% 30.8% 2009 1/1 15.0 3.0 57.6% 70.6% 42.0% 61.5% 33.3% 58.5% 40.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 8.0 2.0 56.5% 74.4% 33.3% 50.0% 28.6% 56.5% 35.7%
21 2007 5/13 1.8 3.4 50.1% 63.3% 50.9% 51.4% 48.5% 57.2% 42.4% 2011 3/3 12.7 4.3 54.0% 75.3% 48.4% 69.0% 15.8% 63.3% 34.5%
22 2008 31/38 4.3 4.1 56.0% 67.3% 43.8% 55.5% 44.4% 56.8% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 17/18 2.9 4.2 58.2% 63.3% 43.6% 50.6% 40.6% 55.0% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 17/18 3.8 4.5 56.9% 63.7% 42.1% 49.9% 45.9% 54.4% 40.2% 2014 4/4 9.3 4.3 56.9% 70.8% 43.8% 46.7% 42.1% 59.1% 29.0%
25 2011 15/18 2.4 3.8 58.1% 64.4% 43.8% 50.6% 47.5% 55.6% 41.2% 2015 6/10 10.3 3.3 63.4% 78.6% 45.8% 46.4% 27.9% 66.7% 32.4%
26 2012 28/29 3.4 3.8 58.8% 64.3% 46.8% 57.9% 50.1% 57.1% 41.7% 2016 23/26 8.4 4.8 57.9% 70.2% 39.9% 50.5% 38.0% 57.4% 36.1%
27 2013 10/11 1.6 5.2 60.7% 55.7% 40.2% 31.8% 43.5% 49.5% 37.1% 2017 17/17 9.6 4.1 57.9% 74.7% 44.9% 49.7% 46.1% 62.0% 33.3%
28 2014 17/17 1.9 4.2 57.9% 64.1% 38.9% 43.7% 43.9% 53.9% 40.3% 2018 4/4 12.5 3.5 58.4% 64.4% 50.3% 64.0% 10.0% 58.8% 30.1%
29 2015 11/11 2.7 4.6 58.6% 60.2% 50.4% 45.1% 41.8% 55.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 28/28 3.0 3.7 58.0% 62.4% 47.0% 55.3% 47.8% 55.8% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 34/34 3.0 4.3 57.0% 62.7% 44.2% 53.0% 48.5% 54.7% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 31/31 2.4 3.7 60.1% 63.0% 43.0% 55.8% 43.6% 55.0% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 32/33 2.2 3.0 58.0% 63.2% 43.8% 52.3% 41.7% 55.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 4/4 1.8 3.0 58.6% 59.5% 34.3% 42.8% 50.0% 49.2% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 281/308 2.9 3.9 57.9% 63.3% 44.0% 51.9% 45.6% 55.1% 40.9% — 59/67 9.6 4.2 58.2% 72.3% 43.3% 51.6% 36.3% 60.2% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pauline Parmentier Naomi Broady
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2005 1507 109.7 -0.64 -0.15 0.492 34.5% — — — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 — — -0.04 2009 1485 100.3 -1.38 -3.59 0.963 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.04
20 2006 1487 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.10 2010 1470 99.4 -5.23 -2.65 0.821 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
21 2007 1612 120.9 +1.44 -0.59 0.989 49.5% +20 -83 — 67.9% +1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.74 2011 1473 95.0 +1.81 -0.83 0.939 48.5% — — +46 37.5% -0.62 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
22 2008 1581 112.4 +0.75 -3.13 0.940 48.5% -27 +58 +2 45.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 101.4 +0.83 2012 1463 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
23 2009 1534 107.8 -0.66 -1.62 0.907 48.1% -3 +30 — 38.1% -0.69 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1444 105.5 -1.26 -3.39 0.883 47.3% +88 +19 — 33.3% -0.80 2–7 (22%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.96 2014 1460 101.3 -0.21 -3.52 0.709 45.2% — — +50 30.0% -1.10 1–1 1–0 — +0.03
25 2011 1440 104.6 -0.47 -2.33 0.929 48.2% +40 +36 — 34.1% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 97.9 +0.55 2015 1511 105.2 +3.12 -3.00 0.975 48.6% +44 — -16 47.8% -0.13 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.53
26 2012 1567 120.4 +0.94 -2.00 0.973 49.6% +13 -61 — 47.1% -0.16 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 +0.14 2016 1495 109.2 +0.76 -4.87 0.847 47.1% +47 — -85 41.0% -0.85 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.2 -0.37
27 2013 1464 92.4 -3.33 -3.82 0.734 43.3% +53 -36 — 16.7% -2.42 0–2 1–1 — -0.02 2017 1551 114.6 +2.49 -5.32 0.876 47.9% +6 — -166 42.9% -0.71 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 -0.22
28 2014 1522 116.7 -0.48 -2.01 0.875 47.1% -13 -8 — 39.5% -0.87 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.0 -0.15 2018 1485 104.1 +0.54 -1.89 0.732 44.6% +4 — — 30.0% -1.40 1–1 1–1 — -0.19
29 2015 1460 100.1 -1.71 -4.00 0.797 45.3% +53 -24 — 28.6% -1.86 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — +0.21 2019 1445 88.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1580 120.0 -0.40 -0.40 0.976 49.3% -22 -16 — 49.2% -0.27 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.8 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1657 125.5 -1.45 -0.38 0.962 49.5% +18 -74 — 46.3% -0.16 5–7 (42%) 2–9 (18%) 94.8 -0.59 2021 1434 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1684 119.2 -0.79 -1.64 0.905 48.1% -42 +15 — 47.8% -0.27 8–3 (73%) 5–2 (71%) 108.1 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1594 114.6 -1.35 -2.58 0.887 47.3% +33 -57 -130 32.9% -0.99 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.6 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1540 98.6 -2.06 -1.56 0.767 44.0% — — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1703 118.5 -0.64 -1.98 0.911 48.0% +8 -5 -73 41.1% -0.62 40–52 (43%) 28–35 (44%) 98.1 -0.04 — 1604 108.0 +1.33 -4.25 0.854 47.3% +30 — -43 39.8% -0.76 13–16 (45%) 11–13 (46%) 99.4 -0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.