H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Pauline Parmentier vs Shahar Peer H2H: 0-3

Shahar Peer holds a 3–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2014 Guangzhou Open round of 32 7-6(8) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pauline Parmentier
France Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Shahar Peer
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shahar Peer #135 7-6(8) 6-3 Pauline Parmentier #78 Match data Sep 18, 2014* R32 Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shahar Peer #24 6-2 6-3 Pauline Parmentier #59 Match data Aug 18, 2011* R32 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Shahar Peer #19 6-2 6-3 Pauline Parmentier #105 Match data Sep 2, 2010* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,703 120 188 39.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,969 269 206 56.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pauline Parmentier Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,510 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,635 0 0
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,506 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,828 0 3
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,833 0 3
21 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1 2008 25–21 54.3% #38 1,710 0 3
22 2008 17–21 44.7% #61 1,581 0 2 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,788 0 5
23 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,533 0 2 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,888 0 5
24 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,443 0 2 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,708 0 5
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,439 0 2 2012 15–23 39.5% #74 1,585 0 5
26 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,559 0 5
27 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,464 0 2 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,522 0 2 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,527 0 5
29 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,459 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,579 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,683 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2019 11–22 33.3% #123 1,594 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,540 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pauline Parmentier Shahar Peer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 16 13 29 55.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 22 14 36 61.1% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2007 7 2 9 77.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2008 6 12 18 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 28 14 42 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 32 14 46 69.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2010 2 4 6 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 20 14 34 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 6 9 15 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2015 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 5 8 13 38.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 7 11 18 38.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 99 165 40.0% 48 70 118 40.7% 5 17 22 22.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 191 136 327 58.4% 62 48 110 56.4% 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 281/306 of Pauline Parmentier's and 370/469 of Shahar Peer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pauline Parmentier Shahar Peer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/42 1.4 4.4 55.4% 58.1% 41.3% 58.7% 48.3% 50.7% 44.8%
19 2005 1/3 2.0 5.0 50.0% 45.8% 29.2% 25.0% 100.0% 37.5% 30.8% 2006 30/58 1.1 3.6 64.3% 60.8% 44.2% 51.0% 52.2% 54.9% 47.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 58/60 1.3 2.8 66.3% 63.0% 48.5% 53.0% 52.1% 58.4% 47.4%
21 2007 5/13 1.8 3.4 50.1% 63.3% 50.9% 51.4% 48.5% 57.2% 42.4% 2008 37/46 1.1 2.6 68.0% 61.7% 44.5% 47.6% 45.8% 56.2% 46.1%
22 2008 31/38 4.3 4.1 56.0% 67.3% 43.8% 55.5% 44.4% 56.8% 40.6% 2009 48/57 1.5 2.1 65.2% 61.3% 47.9% 52.4% 48.8% 56.5% 47.1%
23 2009 17/18 2.9 4.2 58.2% 63.3% 43.6% 50.6% 40.6% 55.0% 40.8% 2010 63/68 1.5 3.1 64.4% 64.7% 46.9% 55.5% 49.4% 58.4% 45.9%
24 2010 17/18 3.8 4.5 56.9% 63.7% 42.1% 49.9% 45.9% 54.4% 40.2% 2011 41/44 1.2 3.0 63.5% 60.5% 43.0% 50.2% 46.0% 54.1% 42.9%
25 2011 15/18 2.4 3.8 58.1% 64.4% 43.8% 50.6% 47.5% 55.6% 41.2% 2012 35/38 1.2 3.5 63.2% 59.5% 42.5% 41.1% 48.8% 53.4% 44.7%
26 2012 28/29 3.4 3.8 58.8% 64.3% 46.8% 57.9% 50.1% 57.1% 41.7% 2013 23/24 0.6 3.2 64.9% 57.9% 42.9% 54.5% 48.3% 52.4% 45.5%
27 2013 10/11 1.6 5.2 60.7% 55.7% 40.2% 31.8% 43.5% 49.5% 37.1% 2014 26/28 0.8 4.7 62.5% 59.2% 39.5% 44.3% 48.8% 51.9% 45.1%
28 2014 17/17 1.9 4.2 57.9% 64.1% 38.9% 43.7% 43.9% 53.9% 40.3% 2015 4/4 0.8 3.3 63.6% 52.0% 42.6% 26.5% 60.4% 48.4% 37.1%
29 2015 11/11 2.7 4.6 58.6% 60.2% 50.4% 45.1% 41.8% 55.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 28/28 3.0 3.7 58.0% 62.4% 47.0% 55.3% 47.8% 55.8% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 34/34 3.0 4.3 57.0% 62.7% 44.2% 53.0% 48.5% 54.7% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 31/31 2.4 3.7 60.1% 63.0% 43.0% 55.8% 43.6% 55.0% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 32/33 2.2 3.0 58.0% 63.2% 43.8% 52.3% 41.7% 55.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 4/4 1.8 3.0 58.6% 59.5% 34.3% 42.8% 50.0% 49.2% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 281/308 2.9 3.9 57.9% 63.3% 44.0% 51.9% 45.6% 55.1% 40.9% — 370/475 1.2 3.1 64.7% 61.4% 45.1% 50.5% 49.2% 55.7% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pauline Parmentier Shahar Peer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1510 102.5 — — — — +18 — — 53.8% -0.08 0–1 — — +0.42
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1636 124.9 -1.60 +0.29 0.910 48.0% -10 -58 -78 51.0% -0.03 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.4 -0.40
19 2005 1507 109.7 -0.64 -0.15 0.492 34.5% — — — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 — — -0.04 2006 1829 146.6 -0.62 +1.81 1.042 50.8% -41 -7 -266 61.9% +1.04 11–7 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.4 +0.31
20 2006 1487 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.10 2007 1833 153.0 +2.29 +3.68 1.138 52.8% +7 +25 -154 63.6% +0.84 6–8 (43%) 9–4 (69%) 101.8 +0.52
21 2007 1612 120.9 +1.44 -0.59 0.989 49.5% +20 -83 — 67.9% +1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.74 2008 1710 132.5 +0.71 +1.58 1.054 51.1% +42 +32 0 52.0% +0.17 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 0.00
22 2008 1581 112.4 +0.75 -3.13 0.940 48.5% -27 +58 +2 45.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 101.4 +0.83 2009 1789 138.4 +1.20 +2.73 1.084 52.0% +30 -85 — 60.5% +0.76 9–4 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 108.3 -0.03
23 2009 1534 107.8 -0.66 -1.62 0.907 48.1% -3 +30 — 38.1% -0.69 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 -0.22 2010 1888 152.7 +2.81 +2.91 1.104 52.2% -10 -19 -200 62.7% +0.97 14–4 (78%) 5–6 (45%) 106.9 -0.29
24 2010 1444 105.5 -1.26 -3.39 0.883 47.3% +88 +19 — 33.3% -0.80 2–7 (22%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.96 2011 1708 130.0 -0.93 -0.58 0.936 48.7% +54 +67 — 49.5% -0.07 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 +1.40
25 2011 1440 104.6 -0.47 -2.33 0.929 48.2% +40 +36 — 34.1% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 97.9 +0.55 2012 1586 125.7 -1.37 +0.83 0.959 49.0% +71 +119 +14 41.3% -0.51 1–9 (10%) 2–5 (29%) 86.0 -0.53
26 2012 1567 120.4 +0.94 -2.00 0.973 49.6% +13 -61 — 47.1% -0.16 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 +0.14 2013 1559 108.2 -2.36 -0.25 0.955 49.0% +34 +89 — 41.8% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.54
27 2013 1464 92.4 -3.33 -3.82 0.734 43.3% +53 -36 — 16.7% -2.42 0–2 1–1 — -0.02 2014 1539 108.9 -3.44 +0.83 0.938 48.5% +5 +83 +40 40.3% -0.91 4–7 (36%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.24
28 2014 1522 116.7 -0.48 -2.01 0.875 47.1% -13 -8 — 39.5% -0.87 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.0 -0.15 2015 1527 104.5 -1.91 -2.82 0.718 42.6% — — — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–2 — -0.28
29 2015 1460 100.1 -1.71 -4.00 0.797 45.3% +53 -24 — 28.6% -1.86 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — +0.21 2016 1478 88.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1580 120.0 -0.40 -0.40 0.976 49.3% -22 -16 — 49.2% -0.27 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.8 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1657 125.5 -1.45 -0.38 0.962 49.5% +18 -74 — 46.3% -0.16 5–7 (42%) 2–9 (18%) 94.8 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1684 119.2 -0.79 -1.64 0.905 48.1% -42 +15 — 47.8% -0.27 8–3 (73%) 5–2 (71%) 108.1 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1594 114.6 -1.35 -2.58 0.887 47.3% +33 -57 -130 32.9% -0.99 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.6 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1540 98.6 -2.06 -1.56 0.767 44.0% — — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1703 118.5 -0.64 -1.98 0.911 48.0% +8 -5 -73 41.1% -0.62 40–52 (43%) 28–35 (44%) 98.1 -0.04 — 1969 140.8 +0.35 +1.76 1.032 50.7% +14 +16 -88 54.5% +0.32 76–60 (56%) 51–41 (55%) 103.9 +0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.