H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pauline Parmentier vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 1-0
Pauline Parmentier holds a 1–0 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pauline Parmentier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2012 Strasbourg fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2012* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Pauline Parmentier | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pauline Parmentier | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |