H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Petra Cetkovska vs Edina Gallovits Hall H2H: 0-1
Edina Gallovits Hall holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Cetkovska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Edina Gallovits Hall leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Edina Gallovits Hall won the 2008 Acapulco fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 41
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008* | Acapulco | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Edina Gallovits Hall | 6-4 6-3 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Edina Gallovits Hall | — | — | — | 1,642 | 50 | 80 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Cetkovska | Edina Gallovits Hall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |