H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Petra Cetkovska vs Elena Bovina H2H: 1-0
Petra Cetkovska holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Bovina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2011 Palermo third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2011* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Petra Cetkovska | 6-1 7-5 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Cetkovska | Elena Bovina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |