H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Petra Cetkovska vs Galina Voskoboeva H2H: 1-1
Petra Cetkovska and Galina Voskoboeva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on clay, while Galina Voskoboeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Galina Voskoboeva won the 2013 Guangzhou third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2013* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Galina Voskoboeva | 6-3 6-1 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
| May 28, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Petra Cetkovska | 7-5 6-3 | Galina Voskoboeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Galina Voskoboeva | #1,417 | #42 | 1,284 | 1,701 | 70 | 120 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Cetkovska | Galina Voskoboeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #140 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #113 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #114 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #133 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #106 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #58 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #259 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #421 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |