H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Petra Cetkovska vs Ksenia Pervak H2H: 0-1
Ksenia Pervak holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Cetkovska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ksenia Pervak leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ksenia Pervak won the 2009 's-Hertogenbosch third round 7-5 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2009* | 's-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Ksenia Pervak | 7-5 7-6(6) | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ksenia Pervak | #834 | #37 | 1,475 | 1,703 | 53 | 63 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Cetkovska | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #39 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |