H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Petra Cetkovska vs Nigina Abduraimova H2H: 1-0
Petra Cetkovska holds a 1–0 lead over Nigina Abduraimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2013 Tashkent third round 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 32
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2013* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Petra Cetkovska | 6-2 7-6(2) | Nigina Abduraimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nigina Abduraimova | #487 | #144 | 410 | 1,500 | 6 | 19 | 24.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Cetkovska | Nigina Abduraimova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #603 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #167 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,399 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,368 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |