Petra Delhees Jauch
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | 0 | 7 | 7 | Oct 27, 1983 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 10, 1985 | H2H |
| Susan Mascarin | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 5, 1985 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 8, 1983 | H2H |
| Sabina Simmonds | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 25, 1983 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Petra Delhees Jauch vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-1
Pam Casale holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Delhees Jauch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1981 Roland Garros round of 64 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Casale | 6-3 6-2 | Petra Delhees Jauch | Match data | May 28, 1981* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Delhees Jauch | — | — | — | 1,719 | 69 | 91 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Petra Delhees Jauch | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Petra Delhees Jauch | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1975 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 1977 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1982 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% |
| 1978 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1984 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% |
| 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1985 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 1981 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1986 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| 1982 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1983 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1988 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 37 | 46 | 83 | 44.6% | 6 | 16 | 22 | 27.3% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | Career | 66 | 49 | 115 | 57.4% | 55 | 41 | 96 | 57.3% | 15 | 19 | 34 | 44.1% | 25 | 35 | 60 | 41.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Petra Delhees Jauch | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1975 | 1484 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.26 | 1980 | 1598 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 57.4% | +0.72 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +2.02 |
| 1976 | 1467 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.67 | — | — | — | -0.17 | 1981 | 1811 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -153 | -196 | 64.1% | +1.03 | 3–6 (33%) | 6–0 (100%) | 101.9 | +1.97 |
| 1977 | 1450 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.42 | 1982 | 1745 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | -54 | -4 | -106 | 50.5% | +0.01 | 1–8 (11%) | 9–5 (64%) | 95.5 | -3.37 |
| 1978 | 1533 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +53 | -9 | 39.1% | -0.96 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.07 | 1983 | 1770 | 144.1 | — | — | — | — | -55 | +93 | -103 | 52.1% | +0.47 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–3 (50%) | 102.6 | -1.57 |
| 1979 | 1652 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | -19 | -54 | -125 | 54.8% | +0.14 | 5–1 (83%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.87 | 1984 | 1914 | 155.3 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -60 | -210 | 64.8% | +1.01 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.3 | -2.46 |
| 1980 | 1580 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -12 | — | 35.9% | -0.79 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.8 | +1.16 | 1985 | 1814 | 137.6 | — | — | — | — | +80 | -54 | -188 | 53.1% | +0.34 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | -1.08 |
| 1981 | 1584 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +12 | -38 | 42.1% | -0.21 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.4 | +0.74 | 1986 | 1788 | 137.1 | — | — | — | — | -56 | +52 | — | 46.8% | -0.18 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.7 | -3.63 |
| 1982 | 1619 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -48 | -27 | -57 | 41.7% | -0.78 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.1 | -2.23 | 1987 | 1673 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | -20 | — | -77 | 41.7% | -0.56 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.50 |
| 1983 | 1673 | 122.9 | — | — | — | — | -58 | +21 | — | 48.5% | -0.05 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.7 | +0.98 | 1988 | 1552 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +207 | — | 36.4% | -0.79 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | 92.4 | +1.01 |
| 1984 | 1641 | 109.6 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -25 | — | 36.7% | -1.13 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | -0.15 | 1989 | 1547 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.21 |
| 1985 | 1705 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | -86 | +6 | — | 56.5% | +0.17 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -1.26 | 1990 | 1526 | 90.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.21 |
| Career | 1719 | 129.5 | — | — | — | — | -42 | +2 | -58 | 44.1% | -0.47 | 18–24 (43%) | 12–16 (43%) | 99.0 | +0.43 | Career | 1944 | 143.5 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +5 | -153 | 53.9% | +0.36 | 32–43 (43%) | 38–21 (64%) | 100.1 | -2.42 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Pam Casale
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 3 | 7 | 10 | May 10, 1986 | H2H |
| Pilar Vasquez | 5 | 2 | 7 | Apr 6, 1988 | H2H |
| Bonnie Gadusek | 0 | 7 | 7 | Oct 13, 1985 | H2H |
| Bettina Bunge | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 3 | 3 | 6 | Nov 13, 1986 | H2H |