H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Petra Kvitova vs Kateryna Volodko H2H: 2-2

Petra Kvitova and Kateryna Volodko are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kateryna Volodko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Petra Kvitova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2017 Stanford fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 39 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 4, 2017* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Petra Kvitova #14 6-2 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #111 Match data
Oct 21, 2010* Moscow WTA 500 R32 Hard Kateryna Volodko #126 6-3 6-7(7) 6-1 Petra Kvitova #36 Match data
Aug 26, 2010* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Kateryna Volodko #62 7-5 6-3 Petra Kvitova #29 Match data
May 22, 2008* Strasbourg WTA 500 R32 Clay Petra Kvitova #93 3-6 6-4 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,801 137 187 42.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Kvitova Kateryna Volodko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0
18 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,536 0 0
19 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,630 0 0
21 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7 2008 15–18 45.5% #62 1,646 0 1
22 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,769 0 1
23 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,665 0 1
24 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,719 0 1
25 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17 2012 7–11 38.9% #136 1,659 0 1
26 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19 — — — — — — —
27 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,619 0 1
28 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,606 0 1
29 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1
30 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,653 0 2
31 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28 2018 3–11 21.4% #132 1,568 0 2
32 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,537 0 2
33 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,510 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,530 0 2
35 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,550 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,541 0 2