H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Petra Kvitova vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 1-0
Petra Kvitova holds a 1–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Kvitova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2018 Sydney third round 6-1 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 36
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2018* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-1 0-0 (ret.) | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Kvitova | #450 | #2 | 7,690 | 2,073 | 501 | 258 | 66.0% | 2 | 10 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 31 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Kvitova | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #50 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #34 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2011 | 50–11 | 82.0% | #2 | 2,058 | 1 | 7 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2012 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #8 | 1,961 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #6 | 1,907 | 2 | 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2016 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,966 | 2 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #29 | 1,894 | 2 | 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 2 | 25 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #7 | 1,897 | 2 | 27 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 20–7 | 74.1% | #8 | 1,947 | 2 | 27 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2021 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #17 | 1,881 | 2 | 28 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #16 | 1,920 | 2 | 29 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2023 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #14 | 1,931 | 2 | 31 | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2025 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,773 | 2 | 31 | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |