H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Petra Kvitova vs Petra Cetkovska H2H: 1-0
Petra Kvitova holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Cetkovska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Kvitova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2014 US Open second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 36
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-4 6-2 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Kvitova | #450 | #2 | 7,690 | 2,073 | 501 | 258 | 66.0% | 2 | 10 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 31 |
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Kvitova | Petra Cetkovska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #50 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #34 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 50–11 | 82.0% | #2 | 2,058 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #8 | 1,961 | 1 | 9 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 11 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 2 | 14 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #6 | 1,907 | 2 | 17 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,966 | 2 | 19 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #29 | 1,894 | 2 | 20 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 2 | 25 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #7 | 1,897 | 2 | 27 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 20–7 | 74.1% | #8 | 1,947 | 2 | 27 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #17 | 1,881 | 2 | 28 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #16 | 1,920 | 2 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #14 | 1,931 | 2 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,773 | 2 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |