H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Petra Kvitova vs Vania King H2H: 2-0

Petra Kvitova holds a 2–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2011 Pan Pacific Open round of 16 6-1 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Kvitova
Czech Republic Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Kvitova #6 6-1 7-6(4) Vania King #90 Match data Sep 30, 2011* R16 Pan Pacific Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Petra Kvitova #9 6-4 6-2 Vania King #115 Match data May 28, 2011* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,074 515 262 66.3% 2 9 2 14 4 31
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Kvitova Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1
19 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,702 0 1 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,701 0 1 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1
21 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,059 1 7 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1
22 2012 41–16 71.9% #8 1,960 1 9 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1
23 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,962 1 11 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1
24 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,982 2 14 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,908 2 17 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2016 46–20 69.7% #11 1,990 2 19 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,902 2 20 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2018 43–18 70.5% #7 1,896 2 25 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2019 37–16 69.8% #7 1,914 2 27 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
30 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,964 2 27 — — — — — — —
31 2021 29–18 61.7% #17 1,888 2 28 — — — — — — —
32 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,913 2 29 — — — — — — —
33 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,923 2 31 — — — — — — —
35 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,767 2 31 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Kvitova Vania King
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 2008 6 7 13 46.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 2009 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 2010 11 14 25 44.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2011 25 9 34 73.5% 9 1 10 90.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 5 0 5 100.0% 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 2012 24 9 33 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2013 33 14 47 70.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2014 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 22 12 34 64.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2016 36 13 49 73.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 26 13 39 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2020 15 6 21 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 18 11 29 62.1% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 20 13 33 60.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 21 10 31 67.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 333 178 511 65.2% 100 54 154 64.9% 75 27 102 73.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 700/776 of Petra Kvitova's and 237/288 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Petra Kvitova Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 2008 24/27 3.0 5.3 63.7% 63.6% 47.7% 46.7% 53.6% 57.6% 45.7% 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 2009 30/34 1.8 5.1 59.8% 60.5% 45.4% 55.0% 48.3% 54.5% 47.3% 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 2010 35/37 2.8 4.7 62.7% 64.0% 44.8% 52.6% 50.6% 56.9% 42.7% 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 2011 56/61 3.8 3.5 61.7% 69.6% 52.2% 58.0% 49.5% 62.8% 45.6% 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 2012 51/57 3.5 3.5 63.9% 69.6% 51.7% 55.0% 48.8% 63.1% 47.0% 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2013 68/71 3.6 5.2 62.7% 64.2% 47.5% 58.9% 51.8% 57.9% 44.3% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2014 52/58 4.9 4.1 62.0% 71.2% 51.8% 54.1% 46.7% 63.8% 45.2% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2015 38/51 4.2 3.6 63.4% 73.6% 54.7% 56.3% 49.5% 66.5% 42.6% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2016 57/66 3.8 4.2 61.7% 70.6% 50.9% 56.2% 49.0% 62.8% 45.5% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2017 28/28 5.6 5.9 58.0% 74.6% 47.5% 51.2% 46.1% 63.3% 43.9% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2018 55/61 4.4 5.7 59.9% 70.0% 49.7% 60.8% 50.3% 61.8% 45.9% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2019 45/53 4.9 4.2 61.9% 71.7% 52.0% 60.5% 44.4% 64.4% 44.3% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
30 2020 26/27 4.8 4.2 63.5% 69.7% 53.3% 54.9% 46.8% 63.5% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 42/47 4.5 3.9 64.0% 68.8% 49.7% 62.5% 46.2% 61.9% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 46/47 5.1 4.9 63.0% 68.6% 47.4% 61.8% 52.7% 60.6% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 40/42 5.3 5.5 62.7% 70.6% 47.6% 53.6% 50.3% 61.8% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 7/9 3.1 6.0 63.8% 55.9% 35.9% 46.9% 56.2% 48.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 700/777 4.1 4.6 62.2% 68.8% 49.6% 56.7% 49.2% 61.5% 44.6% — 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Kvitova Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 2007 1485 98.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.05 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 2008 1608 130.9 +1.66 +1.28 1.077 51.5% -18 +7 — 50.0% +0.12 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 -0.04 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23
19 2009 1703 133.5 -0.27 +2.91 1.039 50.9% +7 -102 — 48.6% +0.10 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.83 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09
20 2010 1702 137.8 +1.40 +0.05 0.989 49.8% -21 -143 -22 45.0% -0.47 4–5 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 100.1 -2.15 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36
21 2011 2060 158.0 +7.08 +2.42 1.227 54.1% -93 -295 -101 74.3% +1.54 13–5 (72%) 13–7 (65%) 109.8 -3.06 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43
22 2012 1960 153.8 +6.34 +3.52 1.273 54.6% +3 -103 -2 66.4% +1.26 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.0 +1.48 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2013 1963 151.5 +2.63 +1.47 1.052 51.1% +38 -108 +7 61.3% +0.64 23–12 (66%) 9–7 (56%) 102.8 +2.65 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2014 1982 155.2 +6.82 +2.91 1.250 54.4% -16 -166 +99 66.9% +1.31 10–7 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 103.3 +2.20 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2015 1908 152.2 +7.08 +1.73 1.269 54.3% -11 -15 +115 64.4% +1.07 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 95.4 +0.55 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2016 1990 155.9 +6.43 +2.58 1.224 54.2% +26 -112 -49 67.1% +1.38 11–9 (55%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 -0.37 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2017 1903 140.4 +4.94 +1.34 1.195 53.1% +28 — +99 63.9% +0.87 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) 92.8 -0.22 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2018 1896 151.5 +4.70 +3.13 1.203 53.8% -27 +81 +127 64.7% +1.07 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 104.2 +0.40 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2019 1914 163.0 +6.74 +2.67 1.245 54.0% -18 +139 +129 68.6% +1.29 8–9 (47%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 -0.06 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2020 1965 151.9 +5.00 +3.29 1.269 54.5% -21 +92 — 70.5% +1.49 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 101.7 +0.33 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1889 149.5 +4.60 +1.74 1.160 53.1% +19 +158 +227 63.1% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 94.2 +1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1913 149.9 +3.47 -0.04 1.055 51.1% +11 +3 +252 57.3% +0.48 10–5 (67%) 11–8 (58%) 104.8 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1924 152.8 +4.16 +0.64 1.127 52.2% +25 — +314 64.4% +0.86 6–4 (60%) 11–6 (65%) 101.6 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1768 106.1 -3.70 -3.58 0.711 43.0% +76 +18 — 27.3% -1.50 0–4 (0%) — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2074 157.9 +4.70 +1.98 1.158 52.9% -3 -35 +84 62.9% +0.91 148–108 (58%) 112–84 (57%) 101.7 +0.27 — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.