H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Petra Mandula vs Emma Laine H2H: 1-0

Petra Mandula holds a 1–0 lead over Emma Laine in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Mandula leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Mandula won the 2002 Helsinki round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Mandula
HUN Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Emma Laine
FIN Age 40 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Mandula #93 6-2 6-2 Emma Laine Match data Aug 8, 2002* R32 Helsinki Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Mandula #417 #30 963 1,717 69 81 46.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emma Laine #1,001 #50 429 1,577 21 38 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Mandula Emma Laine
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #843 1,487 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #870 1,472 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #166 1,489 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 4–6 40.0% #92 1,505 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 13–22 37.1% #74 1,525 0 0
21 1999 4–4 50.0% #109 1,515 0 0 2007 2–6 25.0% #247 1,492 0 0
22 2000 4–12 25.0% #156 1,465 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #399 1,503 0 0
23 2001 10–9 52.6% #62 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2002 16–18 47.1% #90 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2003 22–17 56.4% #40 1,692 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2004 12–18 40.0% #81 1,602 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2005 1–3 25.0% #283 1,574 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Mandula Emma Laine
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 12 15 27 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 8 8 16 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 43 65 33.8% 45 32 77 58.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — 20 28 48 41.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Mandula Emma Laine
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1487 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1472 93.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1490 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — -0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1505 106.3 -0.89 -0.92 0.800 44.9% +33 — — 39.1% -1.00 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.01
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1526 120.2 +0.10 -0.37 1.017 49.8% +30 -49 — 40.0% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 93.2 -0.40
21 1999 1516 104.6 — — — — +4 +61 — 47.6% +0.10 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.52 2007 1493 108.2 -2.28 -2.33 0.832 46.0% +33 — — 31.6% -0.84 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.07
22 2000 1466 102.3 — — — — +13 +83 — 33.3% -1.30 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.20 2008 1504 102.0 +0.67 +1.36 0.876 46.8% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.04
23 2001 1559 115.4 — — — — -112 +103 — 49.0% -0.25 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 1580 116.5 — — — — -103 +119 — 48.7% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 101.7 +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 1693 129.7 +0.86 +1.55 1.124 52.5% -117 +76 — 57.8% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.2 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 1602 126.8 -1.23 +1.53 1.037 50.8% -104 +175 — 43.5% -0.17 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 98.4 +1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1575 90.3 +0.39 -1.63 0.841 46.3% -91 — — 22.2% -2.67 1–0 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1718 121.9 +0.10 +1.12 1.052 51.1% -90 +107 — 47.7% -0.26 24–28 (46%) 16–17 (48%) 101.3 +1.77 — 1578 114.5 -0.50 -0.76 0.943 48.3% +31 -49 — 37.7% -0.88 7–9 (44%) 5–9 (36%) 95.7 -1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.