H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Petra Martic vs Evgeniya Rodina H2H: 0-1

Evgeniya Rodina holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Martic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evgeniya Rodina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Evgeniya Rodina won the 2011 Charleston Open round of 64 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Martic
Croatia Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Evgeniya Rodina
Russia Age 37 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Evgeniya Rodina #76 6-4 6-1 Petra Martic #114 Match data Apr 6, 2011* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,938 212 215 49.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Evgeniya Rodina #1,376 #67 882 1,662 74 118 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Martic Evgeniya Rodina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0 2005 2–1 66.7% #320 1,516 0 0
17 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0 2007 1–1 50.0% #120 1,524 0 0
19 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,516 0 0 2008 5–9 35.7% #145 1,522 0 0
20 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,621 0 0 2009 2–4 33.3% #99 1,527 0 0
21 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,691 0 0 2010 5–4 55.6% #107 1,579 0 0
22 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,607 0 0 2011 9–12 42.9% #106 1,560 0 0
23 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0 2012 1–2 33.3% #370 1,547 0 0
24 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #474 1,530 0 0
25 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,613 0 0 2015 14–17 45.2% #87 1,587 0 0
27 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,798 0 0 2016 8–13 38.1% #86 1,652 0 0
28 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,901 0 1 2017 9–18 33.3% #105 1,572 0 0
29 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,804 0 1 2018 9–11 45.0% #71 1,569 0 0
30 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,656 0 1 2019 4–15 21.1% #295 1,473 0 0
31 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,796 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,806 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2024 9–19 32.1% #122 1,635 0 2 2022 2–2 50.0% #438 1,517 0 0
34 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,606 0 2 2023 3–8 27.3% #443 1,507 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Martic Evgeniya Rodina
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 2011 11 9 20 55.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2012 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2013 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 7 7 14 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2015 10 9 19 52.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2018 18 10 28 64.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2019 14 12 26 53.8% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2019 2 7 9 22.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2022 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2022 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2023 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 109 129 238 45.8% 77 63 140 55.0% 24 21 45 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — 49 69 118 41.5% 11 34 45 24.4% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 406/427 of Petra Martic's and 171/187 of Evgeniya Rodina's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Petra Martic Evgeniya Rodina
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2007 1/1 4.0 3.0 51.0% 75.5% 55.3% 50.0% 33.3% 65.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2/3 3.0 5.5 66.8% 69.2% 33.8% 56.3% 66.7% 57.6% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 12/13 2.0 3.0 60.5% 63.9% 45.2% 60.5% 50.2% 57.0% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 18/19 2.4 4.3 62.9% 60.8% 45.8% 55.5% 38.6% 55.0% 37.5% 2008 12/14 2.1 3.6 54.5% 62.6% 42.5% 57.6% 50.9% 53.6% 44.1%
20 2011 27/30 3.8 5.3 56.2% 64.5% 47.1% 50.8% 38.7% 56.7% 41.6% 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 57.7% 65.4% 36.1% 55.0% 38.9% 52.9% 35.2%
21 2012 35/36 4.6 4.3 57.8% 65.0% 45.4% 53.3% 48.4% 56.5% 40.2% 2010 8/9 1.4 2.8 64.5% 55.7% 46.1% 54.2% 65.2% 52.1% 40.8%
22 2013 16/19 4.2 5.4 60.1% 62.7% 45.0% 52.2% 33.9% 55.5% 40.1% 2011 18/21 1.5 2.6 58.1% 60.0% 43.7% 46.0% 47.1% 53.1% 41.4%
23 2014 7/9 3.7 4.0 53.2% 61.9% 39.2% 50.3% 47.2% 51.5% 35.3% 2012 3/3 1.7 4.0 61.7% 58.9% 46.2% 54.5% 40.6% 55.0% 41.6%
24 2015 6/8 4.2 5.3 56.0% 64.0% 40.8% 47.3% 50.6% 54.3% 30.8% 2013 1/1 1.0 4.0 61.9% 53.8% 50.0% 55.6% 100.0% 52.4% 25.0%
25 2016 6/6 4.0 4.7 66.0% 62.8% 47.5% 57.2% 40.4% 57.6% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 10/10 3.4 2.7 68.9% 66.1% 50.3% 55.1% 51.5% 61.0% 45.4% 2015 21/31 1.3 4.0 67.5% 61.3% 47.0% 59.2% 45.7% 56.5% 41.4%
27 2018 43/43 3.2 2.2 62.8% 66.7% 48.8% 56.4% 43.9% 60.2% 42.8% 2016 21/21 0.6 3.9 67.5% 55.5% 39.8% 46.5% 45.7% 50.4% 42.8%
28 2019 52/53 2.6 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 49.8% 59.9% 49.1% 60.7% 44.2% 2017 27/27 1.3 3.8 65.5% 59.4% 42.2% 53.8% 49.2% 53.7% 42.0%
29 2020 25/25 3.2 2.6 61.7% 65.2% 50.7% 64.0% 39.1% 59.6% 41.7% 2018 20/20 1.3 4.4 62.9% 59.0% 42.1% 47.6% 50.1% 52.8% 43.0%
30 2021 36/36 3.8 2.8 58.8% 66.3% 46.7% 51.1% 43.6% 58.1% 39.1% 2019 19/19 0.6 2.9 68.9% 53.9% 37.9% 39.9% 40.4% 48.9% 39.3%
31 2022 42/42 4.5 3.3 60.1% 67.7% 49.2% 48.0% 43.3% 60.1% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 38/39 4.8 3.4 57.1% 68.6% 47.9% 56.2% 40.1% 60.0% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 27/28 4.4 3.5 58.8% 67.3% 42.8% 47.6% 49.7% 57.1% 37.9% 2022 4/4 0.3 2.8 76.6% 54.7% 39.6% 45.3% 52.6% 51.0% 48.3%
34 2025 3/7 1.7 3.7 62.1% 57.5% 38.4% 45.6% 35.6% 50.5% 41.2% 2023 11/11 0.3 3.5 71.4% 54.2% 38.9% 45.9% 42.6% 49.6% 39.3%
Career — 406/427 3.7 3.4 60.3% 65.9% 47.2% 54.3% 44.1% 58.4% 40.8% — 171/192 1.2 3.5 64.7% 58.3% 42.0% 50.1% 47.6% 52.5% 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Martic Evgeniya Rodina
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2007 1480 97.4 -1.36 -1.85 1.117 51.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 2005 1516 106.0 — — — — +30 — — 71.4% +1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.39
17 2008 1506 104.8 -0.42 +0.18 1.145 53.2% +19 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1539 112.1 +0.24 -2.39 0.933 48.5% +1 +22 — 50.0% -0.21 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.36 2007 1525 104.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–0 — -0.07
19 2010 1517 116.5 -0.78 -3.50 0.832 46.5% +35 -37 — 31.8% -1.23 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.7 -0.85 2008 1522 112.9 -0.38 +0.42 0.949 49.1% +9 -20 +122 39.4% -0.73 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 99.1 -0.14
20 2011 1622 125.1 +0.45 -1.86 0.961 48.9% +17 -104 — 51.4% +0.07 10–4 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 111.1 +0.97 2009 1527 103.0 -0.86 -3.18 0.747 44.7% +15 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 2–0 — -0.13
21 2012 1692 131.0 +0.67 -2.20 0.926 48.6% -8 -98 — 48.8% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 104.8 -1.21 2010 1580 104.5 -1.52 -1.61 0.851 46.8% -12 -53 — 47.4% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.44
22 2013 1607 115.3 -1.25 -2.67 0.900 48.0% -10 -6 +18 41.9% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 -0.05 2011 1561 107.9 -1.99 -1.59 0.884 47.5% +26 -88 — 44.7% -0.49 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 96.6 +1.03
23 2014 1516 93.7 -1.25 -4.62 0.729 43.8% +28 — — 17.6% -2.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.24 2012 1547 99.2 -1.97 +0.03 0.925 48.5% +16 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.19
24 2015 1435 105.3 -1.11 -3.28 0.673 43.0% +70 +50 — 0.0% -3.06 — — — -0.11 2013 1530 97.2 -1.63 -1.54 0.525 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09
25 2016 1525 114.6 -0.08 -2.76 0.925 48.4% — +9 — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 1613 126.9 +3.55 +1.52 1.162 53.0% — +3 +54 60.0% +0.96 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03 2015 1587 114.3 -1.34 -0.25 0.953 49.2% -3 -106 +40 44.8% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.05
27 2018 1798 139.6 +3.00 +0.36 1.076 51.1% -18 -100 -125 58.3% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 -0.04 2016 1652 111.1 -3.13 -0.42 0.864 46.8% -1 -199 0 38.3% -0.87 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -0.04
28 2019 1901 146.2 +3.96 +1.65 1.124 52.4% -93 +30 -139 58.5% +0.79 15–3 (83%) 4–6 (40%) 110.1 -0.27 2017 1572 113.9 -1.33 -0.70 0.908 47.9% +6 -145 +93 32.7% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 4–5 (44%) 100.0 -0.83
29 2020 1805 132.1 +1.70 -1.09 1.032 50.6% -35 +79 — 56.7% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 98.0 +1.15 2018 1569 113.3 -3.31 -0.20 0.910 47.9% -42 -118 +190 44.0% -0.60 6–4 (60%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.11
30 2021 1657 123.5 +1.00 -2.75 0.932 48.5% -33 +198 +99 43.7% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 4–8 (33%) 94.0 +2.13 2019 1473 97.7 -5.16 -2.99 0.769 44.2% -12 -65 +244 24.4% -1.75 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +0.69
31 2022 1796 134.2 +2.70 -0.72 1.026 50.4% -88 +143 -60 56.3% +0.31 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 107.9 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1807 141.5 +3.00 -1.92 0.994 49.7% -62 +90 +3 47.1% -0.20 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1636 121.5 +0.25 -3.87 0.883 47.5% -6 +131 +180 35.4% -0.94 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 +0.09 2022 1518 118.6 +0.07 +0.24 0.984 50.0% -17 — — 55.6% +0.67 0–1 — — -0.30
34 2025 1607 111.0 -0.30 -0.75 0.832 45.5% -40 +116 — 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.57 2023 1508 106.1 -3.39 -1.97 0.779 45.1% +13 -163 +168 30.0% -1.50 — — — +0.01
Career — 1938 136.0 +1.65 -1.36 0.980 49.5% -28 +38 -14 48.7% -0.08 86–63 (58%) 58–54 (52%) 109.3 +0.72 — 1663 113.8 -2.32 -1.00 0.874 47.2% +1 -107 +119 39.2% -0.80 24–26 (48%) 22–16 (58%) 106.4 +0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.