H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Petra Martic vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 1-0

Petra Martic holds a 1–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Martic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2018 Italian Open first round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Martic
Croatia Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Martic #36 6-1 6-2 Lesia Tsurenko #37 Match data May 16, 2018* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,938 212 215 49.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Martic Lesia Tsurenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,621 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0
21 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,691 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0
22 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,607 0 0 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0
23 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0
24 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0
25 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0
26 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,613 0 0 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1
27 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,798 0 0 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2
28 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,901 0 1 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3
29 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,804 0 1 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4
30 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,656 0 1 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4
31 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,796 0 2 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4
32 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,806 0 2 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4
33 2024 9–19 32.1% #122 1,635 0 2 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4
34 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,606 0 2 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Martic Lesia Tsurenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 11 9 20 55.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2018 18 10 28 64.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2019 14 12 26 53.8% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
29 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
30 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
31 2022 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 109 129 238 45.8% 77 63 140 55.0% 24 21 45 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 406/427 of Petra Martic's and 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Petra Martic Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2007 1/1 4.0 3.0 51.0% 75.5% 55.3% 50.0% 33.3% 65.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2/3 3.0 5.5 66.8% 69.2% 33.8% 56.3% 66.7% 57.6% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 12/13 2.0 3.0 60.5% 63.9% 45.2% 60.5% 50.2% 57.0% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 18/19 2.4 4.3 62.9% 60.8% 45.8% 55.5% 38.6% 55.0% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 27/30 3.8 5.3 56.2% 64.5% 47.1% 50.8% 38.7% 56.7% 41.6% 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6%
21 2012 35/36 4.6 4.3 57.8% 65.0% 45.4% 53.3% 48.4% 56.5% 40.2% 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6%
22 2013 16/19 4.2 5.4 60.1% 62.7% 45.0% 52.2% 33.9% 55.5% 40.1% 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4%
23 2014 7/9 3.7 4.0 53.2% 61.9% 39.2% 50.3% 47.2% 51.5% 35.3% 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7%
24 2015 6/8 4.2 5.3 56.0% 64.0% 40.8% 47.3% 50.6% 54.3% 30.8% 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8%
25 2016 6/6 4.0 4.7 66.0% 62.8% 47.5% 57.2% 40.4% 57.6% 39.3% 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5%
26 2017 10/10 3.4 2.7 68.9% 66.1% 50.3% 55.1% 51.5% 61.0% 45.4% 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8%
27 2018 43/43 3.2 2.2 62.8% 66.7% 48.8% 56.4% 43.9% 60.2% 42.8% 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5%
28 2019 52/53 2.6 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 49.8% 59.9% 49.1% 60.7% 44.2% 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4%
29 2020 25/25 3.2 2.6 61.7% 65.2% 50.7% 64.0% 39.1% 59.6% 41.7% 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0%
30 2021 36/36 3.8 2.8 58.8% 66.3% 46.7% 51.1% 43.6% 58.1% 39.1% 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8%
31 2022 42/42 4.5 3.3 60.1% 67.7% 49.2% 48.0% 43.3% 60.1% 40.9% 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8%
32 2023 38/39 4.8 3.4 57.1% 68.6% 47.9% 56.2% 40.1% 60.0% 39.8% 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3%
33 2024 27/28 4.4 3.5 58.8% 67.3% 42.8% 47.6% 49.7% 57.1% 37.9% 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1%
34 2025 3/7 1.7 3.7 62.1% 57.5% 38.4% 45.6% 35.6% 50.5% 41.2% 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7%
Career — 406/427 3.7 3.4 60.3% 65.9% 47.2% 54.3% 44.1% 58.4% 40.8% — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Martic Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2007 1480 97.4 -1.36 -1.85 1.117 51.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1506 104.8 -0.42 +0.18 1.145 53.2% +19 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1539 112.1 +0.24 -2.39 0.933 48.5% +1 +22 — 50.0% -0.21 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1517 116.5 -0.78 -3.50 0.832 46.5% +35 -37 — 31.8% -1.23 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.7 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1622 125.1 +0.45 -1.86 0.961 48.9% +17 -104 — 51.4% +0.07 10–4 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 111.1 +0.97 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15
21 2012 1692 131.0 +0.67 -2.20 0.926 48.6% -8 -98 — 48.8% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 104.8 -1.21 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08
22 2013 1607 115.3 -1.25 -2.67 0.900 48.0% -10 -6 +18 41.9% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 -0.05 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34
23 2014 1516 93.7 -1.25 -4.62 0.729 43.8% +28 — — 17.6% -2.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.24 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05
24 2015 1435 105.3 -1.11 -3.28 0.673 43.0% +70 +50 — 0.0% -3.06 — — — -0.11 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31
25 2016 1525 114.6 -0.08 -2.76 0.925 48.4% — +9 — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.05 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32
26 2017 1613 126.9 +3.55 +1.52 1.162 53.0% — +3 +54 60.0% +0.96 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25
27 2018 1798 139.6 +3.00 +0.36 1.076 51.1% -18 -100 -125 58.3% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 -0.04 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38
28 2019 1901 146.2 +3.96 +1.65 1.124 52.4% -93 +30 -139 58.5% +0.79 15–3 (83%) 4–6 (40%) 110.1 -0.27 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57
29 2020 1805 132.1 +1.70 -1.09 1.032 50.6% -35 +79 — 56.7% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 98.0 +1.15 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69
30 2021 1657 123.5 +1.00 -2.75 0.932 48.5% -33 +198 +99 43.7% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 4–8 (33%) 94.0 +2.13 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24
31 2022 1796 134.2 +2.70 -0.72 1.026 50.4% -88 +143 -60 56.3% +0.31 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 107.9 +0.20 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91
32 2023 1807 141.5 +3.00 -1.92 0.994 49.7% -62 +90 +3 47.1% -0.20 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 -0.59 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04
33 2024 1636 121.5 +0.25 -3.87 0.883 47.5% -6 +131 +180 35.4% -0.94 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 +0.09 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59
34 2025 1607 111.0 -0.30 -0.75 0.832 45.5% -40 +116 — 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.57 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10
Career — 1938 136.0 +1.65 -1.36 0.980 49.5% -28 +38 -14 48.7% -0.08 86–63 (58%) 58–54 (52%) 109.3 +0.72 — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.