H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Petra Martic vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-1

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Martic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2014 Doha second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Martic
CRO Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2014* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #48 6-2 6-2 Petra Martic #104 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,942 212 214 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Martic Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,506 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,512 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,613 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,690 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,606 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,612 0 0 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,795 0 0 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,903 0 1 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,805 0 1 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,658 0 1 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,794 0 2 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,808 0 2 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2024 9–18 33.3% #122 1,649 0 2 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,611 0 2 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47