H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Petra Martic vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 2-1
Petra Martic holds a 2–1 lead over Yanina Wickmayer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Petra Martic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2011 Cincinnati third round 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2011* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Petra Martic | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2010* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-3 6-3 | Petra Martic | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2010* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Petra Martic | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Martic | #349 | #14 | 2,850 | 1,942 | 212 | 214 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Martic | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #142 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2011 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #50 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2012 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2013 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #107 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2014 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #186 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #262 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #89 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2018 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #32 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #15 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2020 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2021 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2022 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #40 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2024 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #209 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |