H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pilar Vasquez vs Dana Gilbert H2H: 2-1
Pilar Vasquez holds a 2–1 lead over Dana Gilbert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Pilar Vasquez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pilar Vasquez won the 1983 Indianapolis second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1983* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Pilar Vasquez | 6-3 7-5 | Dana Gilbert | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1982* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Pilar Vasquez | 2-6 7-6 7-6 | Dana Gilbert | Match data |
| May 13, 1982* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Dana Gilbert | 3-6 6-0 7-6 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Dana Gilbert | — | — | — | 1,712 | 61 | 79 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pilar Vasquez | Dana Gilbert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 3–13 | 18.8% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |