H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Pilar Vasquez vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 2-3
Patricia Medrado holds a 3–2 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1984 Indianapolis Indoors fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1984* | Indianapolis Indoors | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Patricia Medrado | 6-4 6-4 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| May 12, 1983* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 2-6 7-6 6-2 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1981* | Curitiba | WTA 250 | SF | — | Pilar Vasquez | 6-3 6-2 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1981* | Porto Alegre | WTA 250 | F | — | Patricia Medrado | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| Mar 28, 1981* | Salvador | WTA 250 | SF | — | Pilar Vasquez | 7-6 7-6 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pilar Vasquez | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |