H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Polona Hercog vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 0-3
Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 3–0 lead over Polona Hercog in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2019 S-Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 35
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2019* | S-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 6-4 7-6(5) | Polona Hercog | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2019* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 6-4 6-3 | Polona Hercog | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2018* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Polona Hercog | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polona Hercog | #228 | #35 | 1,605 | 1,768 | 170 | 212 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Polona Hercog | Alison Riske-Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #47 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,701 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #85 | 1,626 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #49 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #134 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |