H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Polona Hercog vs Carla Suárez Navarro H2H: 3-3

Polona Hercog and Carla Suárez Navarro are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 3–2 on clay, while Polona Hercog leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Polona Hercog won the 2019 Lugano third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.

SLO Age 35 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 11, 2019* Lugano WTA 250 R32 Clay Polona Hercog #89 3-6 6-3 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #27 Match data
May 3, 2014* Oeiras WTA 250 QF Clay Carla Suárez Navarro #15 6-1 6-3 Polona Hercog #64 Match data
May 4, 2012* Estoril WTA 250 R16 Clay Carla Suárez Navarro #58 6-4 3-0 (ret.) Polona Hercog #37 Match data
Sep 23, 2011* Seoul WTA 250 R16 Hard Polona Hercog #35 6-3 7-5 Carla Suárez Navarro #60 Match data
Apr 9, 2010* Marbella WTA 250 R16 Clay Carla Suárez Navarro #38 6-4 7-6(2) Polona Hercog #51 Match data
Feb 27, 2010* Acapulco WTA 250 SF Clay Polona Hercog #60 6-3 7-5 Carla Suárez Navarro #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Polona Hercog #228 #35 1,605 1,768 170 212 44.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Polona Hercog Carla Suárez Navarro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #375 1,488 0 0
17 2008 0–2 0.0% #245 1,470 0 0
18 2009 6–8 42.9% #68 1,501 0 0
19 2010 26–24 52.0% #47 1,671 0 0 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0
20 2011 27–25 51.9% #36 1,699 0 1 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0
21 2012 14–20 41.2% #76 1,676 0 2 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0
22 2013 10–10 50.0% #65 1,701 0 2 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0
23 2014 12–16 42.9% #97 1,647 0 2 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0
24 2015 19–23 45.2% #73 1,609 0 2 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0
25 2016 10–16 38.5% #143 1,573 0 2 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1
26 2017 2–2 50.0% #101 1,584 0 2 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1
27 2018 15–19 44.1% #85 1,626 0 2 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2
28 2019 19–21 47.5% #49 1,714 0 3 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #49 1,683 0 3 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2
30 2021 4–15 21.1% #134 1,590 0 3 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2
32 2023 0–1 0.0% #267 1,565 0 3 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,628 0 3