H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 22:32 UTC

Polona Hercog vs Julia Goerges H2H: 2-5

Julia Goerges holds a 5–2 lead over Polona Hercog in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 4–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Polona Hercog won the 2019 Beijing second round 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-4.

SLO Age 35 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 28, 2019 Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Polona Hercog #52 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-4 Julia Goerges #25 Match data
Aug 7, 2019* Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Julia Goerges #25 6-3 1-6 7-6(5) Polona Hercog #54 Match data
Jan 6, 2018* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Julia Goerges #14 6-4 6-4 Polona Hercog #100 Match data
Jul 21, 2016* Bastad WTA 250 R32 Clay Julia Goerges #73 6-7(7) 6-3 6-4 Polona Hercog #91 Match data
Jul 20, 2012* Bastad WTA 250 R16 Clay Polona Hercog #86 7-6(4) 6-2 Julia Goerges #24 Match data
Jan 18, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Julia Goerges #23 6-3 7-6(3) Polona Hercog #35 Match data
Oct 14, 2010* Linz WTA 500 R32 Hard Julia Goerges #43 6-4 4-6 6-4 Polona Hercog #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Polona Hercog #228 #35 1,605 1,768 170 212 44.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Polona Hercog Julia Goerges
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2007 0–1 0.0% #375 1,488 0 0 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0
2008 0–2 0.0% #245 1,470 0 0 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0
2009 6–8 42.9% #68 1,501 0 0 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0
2010 26–24 52.0% #47 1,671 0 0 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1
2011 27–25 51.9% #36 1,699 0 1 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2
2012 14–20 41.2% #76 1,676 0 2 2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2
2013 10–10 50.0% #65 1,701 0 2 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2
2014 12–16 42.9% #97 1,647 0 2 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2
2015 19–23 45.2% #73 1,609 0 2 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2
2016 10–16 38.5% #143 1,573 0 2 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2
2017 2–2 50.0% #101 1,584 0 2 2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4
2018 15–19 44.1% #85 1,626 0 2 2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6
2019 19–21 47.5% #49 1,714 0 3 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7
2020 6–8 42.9% #49 1,683 0 3 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7
2021 4–15 21.1% #134 1,590 0 3
2023 0–1 0.0% #267 1,565 0 3
2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,628 0 3