H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Polona Hercog vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 2-1
Polona Hercog holds a 2–1 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Polona Hercog leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Polona Hercog won the 2019 Eastbourne third round 2-6 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 35
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2019* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Polona Hercog | 2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2018* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Pauline Parmentier | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Polona Hercog | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2011* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Polona Hercog | 6-7(2) 7-6(10) 6-2 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polona Hercog | #228 | #35 | 1,605 | 1,768 | 170 | 212 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Polona Hercog | Pauline Parmentier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #47 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,701 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2014 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2015 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2016 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #85 | 1,626 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2019 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #49 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #134 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |