H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC

Polona Hercog vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-1

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Polona Hercog in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2010 Acapulco final 2-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Polona Hercog
SLO Age 35 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 28, 2010* Acapulco WTA 250 F Clay Venus Williams #5 2-6 6-2 6-3 Polona Hercog #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Polona Hercog #228 #35 1,605 1,768 170 212 44.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Polona Hercog Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #375 1,488 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2008 0–2 0.0% #245 1,470 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2009 6–8 42.9% #68 1,501 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2010 26–24 52.0% #47 1,671 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2011 27–25 51.9% #36 1,699 0 1 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2012 14–20 41.2% #76 1,676 0 2 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2013 10–10 50.0% #65 1,701 0 2 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2014 12–16 42.9% #97 1,647 0 2 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2015 19–23 45.2% #73 1,609 0 2 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2016 10–16 38.5% #143 1,573 0 2 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2017 2–2 50.0% #101 1,584 0 2 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2018 15–19 44.1% #85 1,626 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2019 19–21 47.5% #49 1,714 0 3 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #49 1,683 0 3 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2021 4–15 21.1% #134 1,590 0 3 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2023 0–1 0.0% #267 1,565 0 3 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,628 0 3 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47