H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Priscilla Hon vs Margarita Gasparyan H2H: 0-1
Margarita Gasparyan holds a 1–0 lead over Priscilla Hon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Margarita Gasparyan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Margarita Gasparyan won the 2019 US Open first round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Margarita Gasparyan | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Priscilla Hon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priscilla Hon | #161 | #101 | 748 | 1,684 | 17 | 40 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Priscilla Hon | Margarita Gasparyan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #517 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #148 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #205 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |