H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Ling Zhang H2H: 2-0
Qiang Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Ling Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Hong Kong third round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2018* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-0 6-2 | Ling Zhang | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2016* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-2 6-2 | Ling Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ling Zhang | #1,153 | #184 | 328 | 1,500 | 2 | 10 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Ling Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #332 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |