H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rachel Mcquillan vs Pam Shriver H2H: 1-4

Pam Shriver holds a 4–1 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Rachel Mcquillan won the 1995 San Diego round of 64 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rachel Mcquillan #85 6-3 7-5 Pam Shriver #131 Match data Aug 2, 1995* R64 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Pam Shriver #53 5-7 6-2 8-6 Rachel Mcquillan #70 Match data Jun 24, 1994* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver #52 6-0 6-4 Rachel Mcquillan #71 Match data Jun 10, 1994* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #27 6-3 4-6 7-5 Rachel Mcquillan #46 Match data Jan 14, 1993* R32 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Pam Shriver #5 6-4 6-1 Rachel Mcquillan #156 Match data Jan 18, 1989* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 2002 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 1988 1525 105.3 — — — — +33 — +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 1989 1628 133.6 — — — — -84 +68 — 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 1990 1710 138.1 — — — — -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1991 1745 143.2 — — — — -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1992 1743 134.0 — — — — +48 +31 — 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1993 1571 123.4 — — — — +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) — 0.00 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 1994 1650 132.0 — — — — +20 — -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 1995 1668 136.0 — — — — +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 1996 1564 118.6 — — — — +94 — — 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 1997 1646 124.9 — — — — +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 1998 1528 122.7 — — — — +87 -7 — 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.66 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 1999 1521 111.6 — — — — +78 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.09 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 2000 1464 94.4 — — — — +80 — — 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.36 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 2001 1524 120.3 — — — — +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 2002 1474 99.4 — — — — +43 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 — +0.25 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 2003 1464 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 1826 136.8 — — — — +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.