H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 2-1
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 2–1 lead over Kathy Horvath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1988 Key Biscayne second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1988* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-4 7-5 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Mar 30, 1985* | Palm Beach | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-2 6-3 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
| May 24, 1984* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 7-6 7-5 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |