H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raquel Giscafre vs Carmen Perea Alcala H2H: 1-1
Raquel Giscafre and Carmen Perea Alcala are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raquel Giscafre leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carmen Perea Alcala won the 1980 Manchester third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1980* | Manchester | WTA 250 | R32 | — | Carmen Perea Alcala | 6-2 7-5 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| May 24, 1973* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Raquel Giscafre | 6-4 6-2 | Carmen Perea Alcala | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Carmen Perea Alcala | — | — | — | 1,662 | 49 | 55 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raquel Giscafre | Carmen Perea Alcala | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |