H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Raquel Giscafre vs Isabel Fernandez De Soto H2H: 0-3
Isabel Fernandez De Soto holds a 3–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Isabel Fernandez De Soto leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Isabel Fernandez De Soto won the 1975 Orlando third round 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1975* | Orlando | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | 7-5 7-6 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1974* | Edinburgh | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | 5-7 6-0 6-4 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1971* | Lisbon | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Isabel Fernandez De Soto | — | — | — | 1,783 | 90 | 106 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raquel Giscafre | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |