H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Regina Marsikova vs Julie Richardson H2H: 0-1

Julie Richardson holds a 1–0 lead over Regina Marsikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Richardson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julie Richardson won the 1987 Sydney International round of 64 4-6 6-3 6-0.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
NZL Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Richardson #162 4-6 6-3 6-0 Regina Marsikova Match data Jan 7, 1987* R64 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Regina Marsikova 2,034 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15
Julie Richardson #643 #102 9 1,574 28 65 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Regina Marsikova Julie Richardson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1974 0–2 0.0% 1,499 0 0
16 1975 5–5 50.0% 1,581 0 0
17 1976 17–15 53.1% 1,748 0 1
18 1977 37–17 68.5% 1,909 0 8 1985 2–3 40.0% #145 1,505 0 0
19 1978 56–30 65.1% 1,953 0 12 1986 1–7 12.5% #162 1,456 0 0
20 1979 38–24 61.3% 1,937 0 12 1987 5–7 41.7% #157 1,480 0 0
21 1980 33–22 60.0% 1,899 0 14 1988 12–15 44.4% #103 1,557 0 0
22 1981 34–16 68.0% 1,996 0 15 1989 1–7 12.5% #257 1,507 0 0
23 1990 5–7 41.7% #137 1,528 0 0
24 1991 0–3 0.0% #556 1,504 0 0
25 1992 1–8 11.1% #157 1,459 0 0
26 1985 12–16 42.9% 1,763 0 15 1993 1–6 14.3% #301 1,411 0 0
27 1986 15–19 44.1% 1,719 0 15 1994 0–2 0.0% #367 1,400 0 0
28 1987 14–19 42.4% 1,672 0 15
29 1988 4–7 36.4% 1,605 0 15
30 1989 1–6 14.3% 1,540 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Regina Marsikova Julie Richardson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1976 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
18 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1985 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1987 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1988 10 11 21 47.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1991 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
30 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
Career 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3% 19 41 60 31.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 17 26 34.6% 0 5 5 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Regina Marsikova Julie Richardson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1974 1500 116.5 0.0% -3.50 -0.30
16 1975 1582 125.6 +75 +3 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 +0.09
17 1976 1748 142.4 -178 +62 -176 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.38
18 1977 1909 143.6 -347 +113 -243 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.8 +1.24 1985 1506 109.6 +98 45.5% +0.09 0–1 2–1 (67%) +0.50
19 1978 1953 157.8 -98 +117 -133 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.5 -6.24 1986 1457 96.3 +67 11.8% -2.65 1–0 0–1 +0.40
20 1979 1937 147.6 -80 +154 -90 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.91 1987 1481 103.7 +21 +115 41.4% -0.66 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.9 +1.02
21 1980 1899 147.5 -23 +194 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.21 1988 1558 120.8 -12 +44 45.8% -0.20 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 98.0 +1.35
22 1981 1997 159.3 -116 +182 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -6.03 1989 1507 105.8 -9 +69 21.1% -2.21 1–2 (33%) +0.02
23 1990 1528 104.3 -8 +52 44.0% -0.60 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.93
24 1991 1504 101.0 -22 0.0% -3.33 0–1 -0.21
25 1992 1460 107.6 -39 +124 19.0% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 -0.25
26 1985 1764 131.5 +4 +295 -77 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.30 1993 1411 93.4 -32 21.4% -2.29 1–1 1–0 +0.47
27 1986 1720 126.9 +1 +191 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.11 1994 1400 94.8 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 -0.09
28 1987 1672 129.0 +36 +92 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.58
29 1988 1606 99.5 +87 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 +0.61
30 1989 1541 97.0 +71 14.3% -2.21 0–1 +0.28
Career 2034 150.4 -68 +139 -140 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.12 1575 110.1 -5 +83 33.5% -1.18 11–13 (46%) 8–15 (35%) 97.9 +4.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.