H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Regina Marsikova vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-2
Kathy Horvath holds a 2–1 lead over Regina Marsikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Horvath leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Regina Marsikova | 6-4 6-1 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1985* | Indianapolis US Clay | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 7-5 6-2 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1985* | Orlando | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 7-6 6-1 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Regina Marsikova | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |