H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Renata Baranski vs Heidi Sprung H2H: 1-0

Renata Baranski holds a 1–0 lead over Heidi Sprung in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Baranski leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renata Baranski won the 1989 Guaruja round of 32 6-0 6-4.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Renata Baranski 6-0 6-4 Heidi Sprung Match data Dec 14, 1989* R32 Guaruja WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Baranski 1,543 19 45 29.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Heidi Sprung 1,500 2 12 14.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Baranski Heidi Sprung
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
19 1988 2–3 40.0% 1,481 0 0
20 1989 0–2 0.0% 1,457 0 0
21 1990 0–2 0.0% 1,440 0 0
22 1987 0–2 0.0% 1,473 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,438 0 0
23 1988 2–4 33.3% 1,461 0 0 1992 0–2 0.0% 1,416 0 0
24 1989 7–10 41.2% 1,513 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% 1,410 0 0
25 1990 6–14 30.0% 1,514 0 0
26 1991 4–15 21.1% 1,430 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Baranski Heidi Sprung
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1988 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1989 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1990 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1989 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1991 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 14 28 42 33.3% 3 11 14 21.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Baranski Heidi Sprung
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1987 1481 98.7 33.3% -0.67 0–1 +0.25
19 1988 1482 102.0 +22 45.5% -0.64 0–1 1–1 +0.43
20 1989 1457 84.2 0.0% -5.00 +0.20
21 1990 1441 105.6 20.0% -0.20 0–1 0–2 -0.13
22 1987 1474 98.0 20.0% -2.20 0–1 +0.13 1991 1438 104.8 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.20
23 1988 1461 102.3 +32 30.8% -0.77 1–0 +0.82 1992 1416 96.6 0.0% -2.75 +0.08
24 1989 1513 111.1 +31 43.6% -0.38 2–3 (40%) 0–1 +1.27 1993 1410 99.7 0.0% -2.50 -0.06
25 1990 1515 108.3 +48 -40 +50 36.2% -1.57 2–5 (29%) 1–0 +0.16
26 1991 1430 91.6 +32 +13 24.4% -1.90 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 +1.48
Career 1543 103.9 +36 -9 +50 33.8% -1.29 6–13 (32%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 +6.03 1500 97.1 +22 22.6% -1.61 0–3 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 93.5 +4.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.