H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Renata Baranski vs Luciana Tella H2H: 1-0

Renata Baranski holds a 1–0 lead over Luciana Tella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Baranski leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renata Baranski won the 1988 Guaruja round of 32 2-6 6-3 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Renata Baranski 2-6 6-3 6-2 Luciana Tella Match data Nov 10, 1988* R32 Guaruja WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Baranski 1,543 19 45 29.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Luciana Tella 1,527 5 8 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Baranski Luciana Tella
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 1–1 50.0% 1,505 0 0
17 1987 1–1 50.0% 1,507 0 0
18 1988 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0
19 1989 2–2 50.0% 1,509 0 0
21 1991 1–1 50.0% 1,512 0 0
22 1987 0–2 0.0% 1,473 0 0
23 1988 2–4 33.3% 1,461 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
24 1989 7–10 41.2% 1,513 0 0
25 1990 6–14 30.0% 1,514 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% 1,481 0 0
26 1991 4–15 21.1% 1,430 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Baranski Luciana Tella
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1987 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1988 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1991 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1987 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1989 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1991 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 14 28 42 33.3% 3 11 14 21.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Baranski Luciana Tella
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1505 103.9 60.0% +0.20 0–1 +0.16
17 1987 1507 98.9 50.0% -0.75 +0.24
18 1988 1489 97.7 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.24
19 1989 1510 107.3 44.4% -0.11 1–0 1–2 (33%) +0.16
21 1991 1512 95.3 40.0% -1.60 1–0 +0.24
22 1987 1474 98.0 20.0% -2.20 0–1 +0.13
23 1988 1461 102.3 +32 30.8% -0.77 1–0 +0.82 1993 1492 96.3 33.3% -0.67 0–1 +0.27
24 1989 1513 111.1 +31 43.6% -0.38 2–3 (40%) 0–1 +1.27
25 1990 1515 108.3 +48 -40 +50 36.2% -1.57 2–5 (29%) 1–0 +0.16 1995 1481 96.6 0.0% -2.50 -0.04
26 1991 1430 91.6 +32 +13 24.4% -1.90 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 +1.48
Career 1543 103.9 +36 -9 +50 33.8% -1.29 6–13 (32%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 +6.03 1528 99.3 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +9.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.