H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 1-0
Renata Tomanova holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1980 US Open second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1980* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Renata Tomanova | 6-3 6-0 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Tomanova | Anne Hobbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |